In Navalnyye v. Russia, the Court rejected a complaint under Article 18 in conjunction with Articles 6 and 7 ECHR as incompatible ratione materiae with the Convention. Yet, the dissenting judges have appealed to the Court to reconsider its interpretation.
This summer, the German Federal Constitutional Court initiated its second ever preliminary reference to the CJEU, challenging the legality of ECB policies. This blog highlights its links to previous jurisprudence and its impact on judicial dialogue.
In Ratzenböck and Seydl v. Austria the ECtHR held that a heterosexual couple was not being discriminated against when they were denied access to a registered partnership – a legal institution only available to same-sex couples.
According to Chavez-Vilchez, the third-country national parent of a child who is a Union citizen may get a right of residence, even if the other parent is a Union citizen. Is this just another application of Zambrano or does it change the whole approach?