Is monetary policy too important to be left to judges? Last week’s controversial judgment of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court exposed the challenges for judges in ruling on macro-economic matters. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • May 18, 2020
“Free the MEPs” Roars the Court of Justice? In its Junqueras judgment, the European Court of Justice resorted to the principle of representative democracy to protect European parliamentary rights from national law. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • December 20, 2019
When presumptions are anything but simple A seemingly ordinary ruling sheds some confusion on the European Court of Justice’s case law in the politically sensitive area of state aid. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • October 02, 2018
GDPR: the risks of empowering lawyers, not citizens While the General Data Protection Regulation constitutes a remarkable example of what the European Union can achieve for EU citizens, the implementation reveals some failures for their data protection. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • June 05, 2018
The New Delaware and its Kirchberg Plateau The European Court of Justice recently confirmed in its Polbud judgment the extent to which regulatory competition may prevail in the field of corporate law. A review. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • December 04, 2017 • 1 comment
Welcome refugees, adieu solidarité Hungary and Slovakia suffered a blow in their attempts to escape the refugee relocation scheme, when the European Court of Justice rejected their claims. However, solidarity did not play a role in that decision. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • September 26, 2017 • 1 comment
A ‘Block-booster’ State of the Union In his speech to the European Parliament, the president of the Commission gave Europe food for thought on its future. Though too ambitious, his proposals set the tone for a revival of European integration. Nathan de Arriba-Sellier • September 18, 2017
